There are three things you have to do to run a successful business: you have to pay your bills; you have to invest; you have to grow.
Why should running a country be any different?
Right now congress is wrangling with the debt ceiling in the shadow of a looming deadline: August 2. The U.S. has reached its debt ceiling and if it’s not raised, we could find ourselves in a potentially catastrophic economic crisis. Not raising the ceiling means
our country would default on loans, in other words, not pay our bills. And what happens when you don’t pay your bills? Your credit rating suffers and your interest rates rise.
While congress fervently debates over what needs to be done to raise the ceiling, let’s look at the next basic principle of fiscal success: investing. Obama is hoping for a “grand bargain” that he believes could save up to $4 trillion over the next decade through various tactics like spending cuts, Medicare and Medicaid reform and tax increases for Americans earning more than $250,000 annually.
In a press conference on Monday, Obama said that such a deal could pave the way for investments, including an infrastructure bank to fund transportation projects. Being in the transportation industry, we understand the importance of such an investment. And while both parties are looking to make budget cuts, Obama remains firm on his stance to increase funding in this sector. I applaud this.
Last week House Republicans proposed a six-year, $230 billion highway-funding transportation package, which would cut current funding and is a stark contrast to the $556 billion the White House is looking to slate for highway projects. (See story) In fact, the American Society of Civil Engineers says over the next decade the U.S. needs to invest $1 trillion beyond current levels just to maintain and repair our existing infrastructure.
But it’s not about maintenance; it’s about growth, which leads us to the third principle. Investments, such as transportation projects, increase jobs and stimulate the economy.
As Obama recently pointed out, the housing market bust left one million construction workers unemployed and America needs rebuilding. And without maintaining and
advancing our infrastructure, how can we compete in global economy that is becoming
increasingly competitive?
I realize raising the debt ceiling and managing the national budget are complicated issues that entail too many nuances to address in a single blog. However, I believe revisiting the
basics can help us as we navigate complex issues. Pay. Invest. Grow.
What do you think?
LTL Price Increases: Less-than-Desirable Yet Necessary
UPS started it and others followed.
Estes Express just announced it will raise less-than-truckload (LTL) rates by an average of 6.9 percent. They are the latest in a line of LTL carriers who are trying to keep pace with rising costs by implementing a general rate increase (GRI).
Identical 6.9 percent increases took effect on Monday, August 1, for LTL carriers UPS Freight, YRC Worldwide and Con-Way Freight. ABF Freight System’s 6.9 percent increase took effect a little earlier – July 25. Estes Express’ increase kicks in on August 8.
These GRIs only apply to non-contract freight, which is a small percentage of cargo hauled by carriers. However, the increases come into play during contract talks and ultimately raise pricing for most shippers.
In a letter to customers, Paul J. Dugent, vice president of pricing for Estes Express, echoed the sentiments of his fellow competitors who raised their rates before him.
“Equipment costs have skyrocketed in 2011, spurred by higher prices for raw materials such as metal, lubricants and rubber,” Dugent said.
It reminds me of a quote I read in a recent article in Logistics Management magazine. Lana Batts, a partner at Transport Capital Partners said, “Carriers today are not interested in adding capacity, because rates today are about equal to what they were in 2006. The price of a truck has gone up from $80,000 to $120,000 and fuel is up, too. Everything is more expensive, and the industry is still charging 2006 rates. It is not sustainable. Trucking is not as easy of a business to get into as it was before.”
Industry consultants contend that the increases are a good thing; LTL carriers need to become more profitable. We know what happens when carriers don’t make money – they close their doors. Fewer carriers lead to less capacity and less capacity leads to significant rate increases.
To a shipper’s ears, these GRI announcements are a bit painful. But I believe it’s important to address the issue now rather than down the road when the stakes, and GRIs, could be higher.